SEARCH

Showing posts with label Pentecostals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pentecostals. Show all posts

Why the Holy Spirit matters: Pentecostalism and true spirituality

Authenticity is naturally of importance whenever anything may be of significant worth. Purchasing an item of gold may be gain only if the gold is genuine. Otherwise you suffer a loss, having traded your money for fool’s gold. Worse still, the dealer is a deceiver and a fraud.

Beginning Book I of The Holy Spirit, John Owen shows why this subject matters so greatly by pointing to, not only the absolute dependance of our salvation on the person and work of the Spirit (along with genuine Christianity, the gospel, Christian growth, and condemnation), but also to the many false claims of the Spirit’s work.

1. False spirituality

No area exists with greater levels of deceit than in the realm of spirituality: things pretend be God, or of God, but are not. And the reason is no mystery: The greater the value of a thing (and there is nothing of greater worth that God’s own Spirit), the more often false attempts will be made to represent it. And so the Holy Spirit’s work is often counterfeited. And the greater something’s value the more horrible its abuse. Consequently there is nothing more horrible than false spirituality.

The most visible gift of the Holy Spirit under the Old Covenant was prophecy. But throughout the Old Testament there were more false prophets than true. On the one hand were those who openly served other gods (Deuteronomy 18:20; 1 Kings 18:26); but on the other hand were those who spoke in the name of the Lord, and declared falsely to be inspired by God’s Spirit (Jeremiah 28:2; 1 Kings 22:26; Ezekiel 13:14).

Under the New Covenant it was the gospel that was given by immediate revelation from the Spirit (and declared by his enabling, made effectual by his power and often attested to by miraculous signs from him). Unsurprisingly, false teachers competed by pretending to the very same source of authority. And so the Apostles likened false teachers in this new age to the false prophets of old (2 Peter 2:1) who also claimed divine inspiration.

Consequently, Jesus and the Apostles warned of ‘lying spirits’ and urged Christians ‘not to believe every spirit’, not to give credit to doctrine simply because of an appeal to immediate revelation, but to ‘test the spirits’ because Satan’s work is disguised as the Holy Spirit’s (cf. Matthew 24:24).

And in the very place where we are commanded to this type of proactive caution regarding ‘every spirit’, we are given one very simple means. The Apostle John writes:

We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood. (1 John 4:6).
With definitive clarity the Apostle puts himself and his fellow Apostles up as the litmus test, whereby we can know who and what is from God, or not: “whoever is not from God does not listen to us;” that is, does not listen to the Apostles whose word we have now in New Testament Scriptures. Whoever is from God or knows God, listens to the Apostles: that is how we recognize the Spirit of truth. Everything else is the spirit of falsehood. Or to put it another way, the Spirit without the word is false spirituality.

2. Dead spirituality

Owen’s work also provided an apologetic against those who practice a form of Christianity while all the time denying the supernatural: this is “hostility to the Spirit of God”, and since it is a “sin of despising his person, and rejecting his work now, [it] is of the same nature with the idolatry of old, and the Jews’ rejection of the person of the Son”.

“The doctrine of the Spirit, and his work on the souls of men, in conviction of sin; in godly sorrow and humiliation; in regeneration and sanctification; the supplies of this grace, and his assistance in prayer, have been preached in the world. Men have been taught that the great concerns of their peace, comfort, and assurance, depend on his sacred influences. They have been urged to examine themselves as to their personal experience of these things; and they have been solemnly assured, that if there be not an effectual work of the Spirit on their hearts, ‘they cannot enter into the kingdom of God.’ Multitudes in every age have received these as sacred truths and are well persuaded, that they have found them realised in their experience: but all these things are called in question by some; they look upon them as ‘cunningly devised fables’, as incredible, irrational, and unintelligible notions.” [1]
The Jews had the word of God, and inspired tradition, and reason and sense. They diligently studied their Old Testament Scriptures. And yet the Spirit of God rejected them. So too we who have the New Testament, but if only the letter, if we only philosophise about it, without the Holy Spirit bringing us to obedience to the Lord Jesus of whom the Scriptures testify (John 5:39-40), we are no better than them, who though “they call themselves Jews, and are not, are a synagogue of Satan.” (Revelation 2:9; 3:9) Or to put it another way, the word without the Spirit is dead spirituality.

Pentecostalism and false spirituality

The subject of the Spirit matters so enormously because there are so many conflicting messages about the work of the Spirit. The world itself is full of differing views about ‘spirituality’ and unfortunately, so is the church. And we are told to take warning. There is only one true and living Spirit, God's holy Spirit. Consequently, there is only one true gospel, one message in Christianity, one teaching from God. But in the church today we see multiple conflicting teachings about the Spirit, so that as foretold, faithful Christians need to hold their leaders to the test.

The Pentecostal movement boasts of living and vibrant spirituality, but runs head long into the risk of false spirituality. It was the Holy Spirit speaking to the church of Sardis who said, “you have a reputation of being alive, but you are dead” (Revelation 3:1). Pentecostals and charismatic Christians should take care not to ignore this warning, because confidence in an emphasis on the Spirit’s work is misplaced confidence. The more the claim to the Spirit’s work, the more careful testing required. The only thing that counts for true spirituality is “listening to” the Apostles (1 John 4:6): “This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”

A Pentecostal may happily affirm that the ‘word without the Spirit’ is dead spirituality, but equally so the ‘Spirit without the word’ is false spirituality. The charismatic emphasis on direct and immediate revelation from the Holy Spirit in separation from and in isolation to the word of the Scriptural gospel puts Pentecostalism into this very camp.

Many Pentecostal 'prophets' speak in the name of the Lord, claiming to be inspired by God’s Spirit. But much of their teaching fails to listen to the Apostolic doctrine of the New Testament Scriptures. They are therefore, loathed as I am to admit it, false teachers. The 'full gospel' of 'divine healing' teachers and the 'prosperity gospel' of the 'Word of Faith' movement are obvious and stark examples.

But of more broad relevance is the two-tiered Christianity of everyday Pentecostalism. This comes from 'second-blessing' teachers, who insist on the importance of a subsequent step in Christian experience from conversion/sanctification (in order to receive the full work of the Spirit in power). This teaching puts mainstream Pentecostal preachers squarely into the realm of false teaching because this is a different doctrine(and indeed a different gospel) from what we are given by the Apostles as inspired by God through the pages of the New Testament. All Christians today should take great care to ‘test' this spirit to find out whether or not this is really from the Lord, who said "I will pour out my Spirit on all..." (Joel 2:28; Acts 2:17).

Again I quote the Apostle John:
We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood. (1 John 4:6).
---

Owen, John. The Holy Spirit--His Gifts and Power. Christian Focus Publications 2004, p. 47-54.

[1] Ibid, p. 54.

God over Google: Pentecostalism and our search for answers

There's a generation now turning to the web to find the answers we once asked our parents. Good thing God is indeed God over Google.

I recall being a younster at age 11 when first becoming interested and puzzled by youth leaders describing Pentecostalism and asking me about my lack of experience with Spirit-baptism. After being asked on a mission by one of my leaders, "have you been 'empowered' by the Spirt?", I remember on my return going to my Father, an elder in our bretheren church: "Dad, I want to be empowered by the Spirit."

He gave me a big black reference Bible and showed me how to used the concordance. "Look it up in the Bible" -- seemed like straightforward advice at the time, and I went away feeling that if I could just nail down what the Bible said about this experience, I'd be a step closer to getting what I was obviously missing.

I went straigh back to my bedroom and sat on my bed attempting to look up the word 'empowerment' in the back of this old bible, of course with no joy. And with no idea why I might find nothing under the word 'empower' in the Bible at all, and having nowhere else to turn, I went back to my youth group leaders and friends, asking them for the answers.

That moment of frustration--sitting alone on the bottom of my bunkbed with no adequate access to a proper understanding from either my Father or from the Bible--that was the beginning of what became a 2 year slide into Pentecostalism, as I turned and came more and more under the influence of those with first-hand testimony, relying increasingly on their stories of their experiences.

In September 2006, some fifteen years later, I looked back on that bible flicking moment and had the realisation that if I was that 11 year-old again, but in the present day, I know that now I would have turned at that moment, not straight back to my friends, but first, of course, to Google!

And that's where the idea for this blog came from. And it's the reason I'm continuing to write and post-out to a world of online searchers who are now looking to the web and their social media networks for answers.

I'm looking to be there for those 'young ones' out there who are asking the questions that I once was, who are now going to Google and typing in "how to be empowered by the Spirit?". Hopefully more and more seekers asking these questions will increasingly be finding their way to my site, where they can get some more adequate answers than I first did at that crucial and vulnerable time, now twenty years ago.

The contents of articles in this blog to-date have investigated topics including: the Pentecostal Movement, Pentecostals and their beliefs, the Day of Pentecost, the Charismatic movement and Charismatics, Evangelical beliefs and the Holy Spirit; in particular special focus is given to the origin and history of the Pentecostal movement, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts of the Spirit and miracles, divine healing and the Word of Faith movement, prosperity doctrine and health-wealth teaching, the Praise and Worship movement, guidance, revelation and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

INTRO

  • What is Pentecostalism
  • Why talk about it
  • More information


  • ORIGINS

  • Why origin is important
  • The dawning of Pentecostalism
  • The history of tongues
  • The theology of John Wesley
  • The legacy of Edward Irving
  • The Holiness movement
  • Why Pentecostalism began
  • How Pentecostals saw themselves
  • Why Pentecostalism was successful
  • How Pentecostalism developed
  • Australian Pentecostalism


  • SPIRIT BAPTISM

  • What Pentecostals believe
  • The basis of Pentecostalism
  • What the Scriptures say
  • What is it & what it does
  • The Apostles' experience
  • The day of Pentecost - The Event
  • The day of Pentecost - The Promise
  • The day of Pentecost - The meaning
  • The examples in Acts - Part I
  • The examples in Acts - Part II
  • Tongues and Spirit-baptism
  • The pattern of tongues in Acts
  • Why tongues were given
  • Filled with the Spirit
  • 'Witness' in the Book of Acts


  • GIFTS

  • What Pentecostals believe
  • The Pentecostal basis
  • Speaking in tongues
  • 1 Corinthians 14
  • Mark 16:9-20
  • Miracles
  • Healing
  • Prophecy
  • John Wimber changes his mind


  • PROSPERITY

  • Changing views on money
  • What Pentecostals believe
  • Reformation
  • Perfectionism
  • Divine Healing
  • New Thought
  • Word of Faith
  • A critique
  • A corrective
  • How to get really rich
  • Americanized Christianity
  • Neither Poverty nor Riches
  • How to pray


  • WORSHIP

  • What Pentecostals believe
  • Why Stephen died
  • What is worship
  • Why and how
  • Why we meet
  • What's at stake
  • Do we need the Bible
  • The centrality of Preaching
  • Prophecy & preaching
  • Music in church


  • GUIDANCE & DESTINY

  • What Pentecostals believe
  • Experiencing guidance
  • Listening to the Spirit
  • The Purpose Driven Life
  • The Gospel Driven Life


  • PROS & CONS

  • Positive characteristics
  • Negative tendencies


  • BARNETT & JENSEN

  • The Quest for Power
  • The Bewildered Believer
  • What Neo-pentecostals believe
  • Reading the Bible
  • The Holy Spirit in John
  • The Acts Passages
  • Holy Spirit and Conversion
  • Weakness and Power
  • Pentecostals and Conservatives


  • FOUNDATIONS

  • John Owen on the Spirit
  • Where to draw the line
  • The Answer for Pentecostalism
  • Starting from the Beginning
  • The Problem of Predestination
  • God, Evil & Sovereignty


  • TESTIMONIES

  • My Story
  • Mark Strom
  • James Brinkhoff


  • CORRESPONDANCE

  • Motives?
  • Born again at Pentecost?
  • Pentecostalism from Wesley?
  • Prosperity doctrine from Branham?


  • Gifts of the Holy Spirit: What Pentecostals believe

    Pentecostalism began with a belief that in its origin God was restoring New Testament Christianity by bringing a discovery and recovery of the ‘sign’ gifts to the Church, including tongues, interpretation, miracles, healing and prophecy.

    In the nineteenth century, those in the Holiness movement assumed that speaking in tongues had ended with the close of the Early Church period but that the other gifts such as healing and miracles should still be available to Christians. However, by the turn of the nineteenth century, a widespread desire for the gift of tongues had also emerged. This was coupled with the already existent desire for a restoration of the ‘full gospel’ [1] involving Spirit-baptism as a post-conversion experience of empowerment that enabled the exercise of these sign gifts.

    The Holiness movement revivals that occurred at the beginning of the twentieth century that gave birth to Pentecostalism involved miracles, healing, tongues-speaking, prophecy and discernment gifts. The expectancy of a restoration of the miraculous gifts to the Church as a mark of the end of the Church age lead early Pentecostals to interpret these events surrounding their origin as this end-time restoration of the ‘Apostolic faith’ in preparation for Christ's return.

    Pentecostal churches today continue to place central importance on miraculous and prophetic gifts in the life of the church. All spiritual gifts of the New Testament period are expected to be in use within healthy churches as God’s provision for his body. Such spiritual gifts are seen as an essential part of God’s working within his Church. They are not only to be desired but actively sought.

    More on this topic

    Where did Pentecostalism come from? (The Holiness Movement)

    Why did Pentecostalism begin?

    How did early Pentecostals view themselves?

    - -

    [1] The ‘full gospel’ or ‘fourfold gospel’ is summarized as ‘Christ as Savior, Baptizer, Healer, and Coming King.’ (A. B. Simpson).

    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    Holy Spirit Baptism: The basis of Pentecostalism

    Pentecostalism is a movement with a unique theology regarding 'baptism of the Holy Spirit'. Pentecostalism teaches that baptism with the Spirit is a post-conversion experience of empowerment for supernatural Christian living, with speaking in tongues as the initial evidence. What is the basis for this belief within Pentecostalism?

    The main Scriptural basis for the two stage experience of the Holy Spirit (being firstly, regeneration and secondly, baptism in the Spirit) in traditional Pentecostal doctrine is the narrative accounts in the book of Acts: The day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1-42); the Samaritans (Acts 8:4-24); Saul (Acts 9:1-19); Cornelius (Acts 10:1-48); and Ephesus (Acts 19:1-7). Other New Testament verses used frequently in teaching on ‘baptism in the Spirit’ include Luke’s reference to Jesus’ statement that God is ready to ‘give the Holy Spirit to those who ask’ (Luke 11:13) and Paul’s command in Ephesians 5:18 that Christians should ‘be filled with the Spirit'.

    However Pentecostals have maintained that their doctrine surrounding Spirit-baptism depends on the book of Acts, and insist therefore that correct understanding of the five mentioned passages is crucial. Pentecostals contend that in each of these cases the groups of people concerned were believers who had already experienced regeneration before their experience of baptism in the Spirit:

    The day of Pentecost, Acts 2:1-42

    In Acts 2:1-42, the group of 120 who were meeting together on the day of Pentecost were ‘believers’ (Acts 1:15). Pentecostals hold that the group (including the 12 Apostles) had already received the Spirit (in the new covenant sense) before their experience of baptism in the Spirit. Pentecostals believe this occurred before Jesus’ ascension when he breathed on his disciples and said, “receive the Holy Spirit.” (John 20:22).

    The Samaritans, Acts 8:4-24

    In Acts 8:4-24, the Samaritans had ‘believed Philip’ and been baptised in water before Peter and John prayed that they might receive the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:12-15). Pentecostals believe that these Samaritans were converted under Philip’s ministry and that their reception of the Spirit at the laying on of the Apostle’s hands was a separate and distinct experience.

    Saul, Acts 9:1-19

    In Acts 9:1-19, Saul sees a vision in which Jesus reveals himself as the Lord whom Saul had been persecuting (Acts 9:5-6). Pentecostals maintain that Paul experienced conversion at this time but then 3 days later when Ananias prayed for him (that he might be “filled with the Holy Spirit”) he experienced Spirit-baptism as a second work of the Spirit.

    Cornelius’ household, Acts 10:1-48

    In Acts 10:1-48 Cornelius’ household begin speaking in tongues and praising God while Peter was still preaching the gospel to them (Acts 10:44-46). Although in this instance the experience of baptism in the Holy Spirit occurred at the same time as conversion (it was not subsequent), Pentecostals believe that there is nonetheless a logical distinction between them (separability).

    John's disciples in Ephesus, Acts 19:1-7

    In Acts 19:1-7 Paul meet a group of believers who had repented under John the Baptist. Paul baptises them in the name of the Lord Jesus after telling them the gospel and when he places his hands on them they speak in tongues. Pentecostals believe that these disciples experienced regeneration (at least momentarily) before the Holy Spirit came on them at the laying on of Paul’s hands. Although subsequence may not necessarily be apparent, baptism in the Spirit (at the laying on of the Apostles hands) may be viewed as logically separable to their conversion (before their baptism in water).

    In each of the Acts texts listed Pentecostalism holds that the people concerned were ‘Christians’ before their experience of Spirit-baptism. Pentecostals believe that baptism in the Spirit is subsequent in 3 of the cases (Pentecost, Samaria, Paul) and logically separable in the remaining 2 cases (Cornelius, Ephesians). The conclusion they draw is that (at the very least) there are instances in Luke’s accounts when time separates the Spirit’s work in the conversion and Spirit-baptism of individuals. Since Luke shows that conversion/regeneration and Spirit-baptism can be separate experiences (in time) they are therefore distinctive experiences (in identity).

    Pentecostals see Luke in the narratives of the book of Acts describing a pattern in which conversion is separate from baptism in the Spirit. They therefore further believe that Luke intends in these narratives to demonstrate a normative pattern for Christian experience in all times and as a result maintain that present day Christians should expect the same pattern of experience in their lives.

    More on this topic

    Baptism in the Spirit: What the Scriptures say

    Filled with the Spirit: Pentecostal experiences

    Baptism in the Spirit: What Pentecostals believe

    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    Holy Spirit Baptism: What Pentecostals believe

    The defining belief of Pentecostalism is that an experience of the Holy Spirit, often referred to as ‘baptism in the Holy Spirit,’ is available to Christians to empower them with the gifts of the Holy Spirit. This second experience (which is usually subsequent to conversion but always logically distinct from conversion) should be normative for every Christian. It goes without saying, however, that according to Pentecostalism not all Christians are ‘baptised in the Spirit.’ This is the position held by denominations such as the Assemblies of God, which also emphasise that this experience is always accompanied by the initial physical evidence of speaking in tongues.

    Terminology

    There is a mixture of terms used interchangeably to refer to this experience within the movement. The phrase ‘baptism in the Spirit’ serves as an umbrella term. Other phrases derived from the language of Scripture include the ‘filling' of the Spirit, the ‘receiving' of the Spirit, the 'pouring out' of the Spirit, the Spirit 'falling upon' or 'coming on.' Another example of a phrase commonly used to refer to this experience is the 'empowering' of the Spirit. (E.g. "Have you been 'empowered' by the Spirit?')

    Function

    Few Pentecostals view this experience in terms of the initial reception (or indwelling) of the Holy Spirit although the phraseology of reception is often used when describing it. Less commonly, some Pentecostals speak of a special experience for the believer after conversion when the love of God is felt for them in a unique way. Adoption terminology is used, conveying the view that there comes a time in a Christian’s life when they ‘come of age’ and experience the ‘Spirit of sonship’ in a new way. However, the Pentecostal consensus nowadays holds that this experience is associated with the reception of the enabling power of the Holy Spirit in the life of Christians.

    Origins

    The doctrine of a second blessing or experience of the Spirit for Christians emerged before the close of the 19th century. It has its roots in the eighteenth-century Wesleyan doctrine of entire sanctification, which taught that sanctification involves a second blessing as an experience of the Spirit distinct from conversion. When this doctrine spread to America it inspired the Holiness movement, which reformed Wesleyan theology on the second blessing by teaching that Spirit-baptism was the second experience to empower Christians for miraculous evangelisation. It was during this time that the emphasis within the Holiness movement shifted from sanctification and holiness to ‘empowerment’ for service.

    The historical situation at the turn of the nineteenth-century encouraged the appearance of Pentecostalism, which taught that Spirit-baptism is a post-conversion experience of empowerment for supernatural Christian living. Many modern Pentecostals today believe that their experience of ‘baptised in the Spirit’ equipped them with special gifts of the Holy Spirit. Similarly, others believe that when they were ‘filled with the Spirit’ they received the Spirit's ‘power to be a witness’ according to Acts 1:8.

    Reception

    There are slight differences within the movement regarding how ‘baptism in the Spirit’ is received. Usually, Pentecostal teaching insists that the blessing needs to be actively sought from God. This may be done by praying and waiting at length. However, others maintain that this blessing is immediately available to every Christian; one only need to ask and act accordingly in faith.

    Separability

    Pentecostalism has formulated a number of doctrines associated with this position on 'baptism in the Spirit.' The doctrine of separability is the long-held belief of Pentecostalism that Spirit-baptism is a distinct and unique experience from conversion (or regeneration); that is, it is separate to regeneration (the experience of Spirit-baptism can be separated from the experience of conversion). This belief entails the conviction that Spirit-baptism is dissimilar to regeneration in nature and identity.

    Again, the doctrine of subsequence is the additional belief that this work of the Spirit follows regeneration in time (or at least, in order). However, the doctrine of separability does not depend on the doctrine of subsequence, because two events may be simultaneous though discrete in character. This is why the Assemblies of God's stated position, for example, is that baptism in the Spirit usually follows (subsequence) the experience of new birth but is always distinct from it (separability).

    Questionability

    Has God really promised Christians who have received the Spirit a second reception of the Spirit? What is the case against the Pentecostal view that baptism in the Spirit is a second experience subsequent to conversion? In the future posts, we’ll talk about the specific teaching of the New Testament regarding Christian blessings, baptism and the Spirit.

    More on this topic

    Tongues and Spirit-baptism: What Pentecostals believe

    Baptism in the Spirit: The basis of Pentecostalism

    Filled with the Spirit: Pentecostal experiences

    Defining Pentecostalism

    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    How Pentecostalism developed

    Pentecostalism was shaped to a significant degree by the events surrounding the years of its development. When and how did the development of Pentecostalism take place? What changes occurred after the beginning of Pentecostalism in 1906-9 that transformed this movement? What influenced the way that Pentecostalism took shape in the course of time?

    Major controversies faced Pentecostalism during its first few decades in particular. Controveries created divisions, which in turn created new movements within the movement as a whole. But they also had the added effect of cementing the overall shape that this movement developed through to the present time.

    The first issue to divide Pentecostals centred around the nature of tongues. During the late part of 1906 controvery arose over the accounts of tongues-speaking found in the book of Acts as compared to that found in Paul's second letter to the Corinthians. Some believed that the tongues spoken of in the narrative literature of Acts had a different function to the tongues described in 1 Corinthians 14 – the former providing evidence of Spirit baptism, the latter functioning for the individual's prayer life and for the congregations edification (if interpreted.) Others however believed that the tongues-speaking in the book of Acts and the gift of tongues in the book of Corinthians were the same in nature. Among these was Charles Parham who continued to believe in the preaching function of tongues.

    Before the revival of tongues-speaking that occurred at the turn of the nineteenth-century in conjunction with the beginning of Pentecostalism, Christians who later joined the Pentecostal movement had been expecting the gift of languages to be given to equip the Church to evangelise the unreached millions in their mother-tongues, before the End. However after 1906 an increasing number of Pentecostals recognised that in most of the occurances they had witnessed, tongues-speaking was not actually identifiable in its nature. Christians seemed to be speaking as if praying with unknown utterances (as opposed to preaching in identifiable though foreign languages.) More and more Pentecostals from this time on concluded that the function of tongues was to enable an individual to “pray in the Spirit.”

    The second issue to divide Pentecostals was the number (and nature) of subsequent works of the Spirit to conversion. Were there three works of grace (being conversion, sanctification and Spirit-baptism) or only two (being only conversion and Spirit baptism.) And what were the functions of each work of the Spirit? Did conversion also involve the Spirit's work of sanctification as well as regeneration? Was Spirit-baptism a separate experience involving empowerment and the gifts of the Spirit only? Or did Spirit-baptism also involve sanctification? The resolution of this issue caused the rapid proliferation of Pentecostal denominations within the years that followed as divisions brought new groups, new groups created new movements and new movements developed into separate denominations.

    The third controversy that shaped Pentecostalism arose over the practice of water baptism. A preacher by the name of R. E. McAlister believed that he had discovered a new pattern in the book of Acts that shed light on the restoration of the full gospel to the Church. He noticed that the Apostles baptised individuals in the name of the Lord Jesus only and did not use the Trinitarian formula found in Matthew 28:19. Those who followed his strong Christological emphasis were rebaptised with him into the name of Jesus only and a new movement within the movement began. They began emphasising the “Oneness” of the Godhead in contrast to the Trinitarian teaching on three Persons. This movement is today known as Oneness Pentecostalism (or is referred to as Oneness theology.)

    Each of these three controversies accelerated the formation of different Pentecostal denominations. The Assemblies of God is an example: The General Council of the Assemblies of God came into being in April 1914 in an effort to preserve a doctrinal consensus of opinion that existed among its participants on matters such as the Trinity, “Diving Healing” and “Baptism in the Spirit.” Although the Oneness issue threatened to split the General Council, the theological boundaries that were formulated created a doctrinal unity within their churches that ensured the stability of the denomination.

    “With the condemnation of the Oneness issue, the fathers and mothers of the Assemblies of God assumed that the restoration of the apostolic faith had been protected from error.” [1]
    From this time onward the official teaching of the Assemblies of God denomination was that Spirit baptism is the second (not the third) and only subsequent work of the Spirit after conversion, that it functions for the empowerment of believers, and that sanctification is an outworking of the Spirit's reception in salvation from the moment of conversion onwards.

    By way of summary then, the early decades of the twentieth-century were defining years for Pentecostalism. Dividing controversies arose over the nature of tongues, the nature and number of subsequent works of the Spirit, and the practice of water baptism. The resolution of these issues accelerated the formation of different Pentecostal denominations, each of which took different doctrinal stances.

    More on this topic

    Where Australian Pentecostalism came from

    Why Pentecostalism was successful

    Baptism in the Spirit: What Pentecostals believe

    - -

    [1] Gary B. McGee (Ph.D., Professor of Church History, Chair, Bible and Theology Department at Assemblies of God Theological Seminary), Systematic Theology, Chapter 1 “Historical Background”, Logion Press, 1995, p. 20.

    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    Why Pentecostalism was successful

    Only three years after the revival of tongues-speaking that began in 1906 at Azusa Street, Pentecostalism had become a world-wide movement. Why did Pentecostalism grow so rapidly?

    The origin of Pentecostalism must be understood against the backdrop of a revival of tongues-speaking that occured in 1901 in Topeka, after which Charles Parham formulated a new doctrine of Spirit-baptism. He taught that baptism in the Spirit is a third work of grace, separate to conversion and sanctification, with the initial evidence of tongues-speaking.

    The Topeka Revival sowed the seed of Pentecostalism. [1] Charles Parham had grown up in Methodist and Holiness circles. Following the lead of many others in this movement he strongly emphasised the gifts of the Spirit, including healing.

    Parham had been influenced significantly by Benjamin Irwin and Frank Sandford. Following Stanford, Parham understood tongues to have a preaching function. Consequently he and his followers were among those hoping to receive the power of the Spirit to rapidly evangelise the world at the turn of the nineteenth century by speaking in other languages.

    Like Irwin he understood baptism in the Spirit to be a third work of grace empowering the believer and gifting them for evangelism. He taught that those who had been converted and had gone forward to entire sanctification (Wesley's Christian perfection) should expect a baptism of “the Holy Spirit and fire.”

    Parham was part of a Bible study group which was made up of some of his students and several Baptist ministers. After studying of the Book of Acts, Parham came to his conclusion that tongues was the “initial evidence” of Spirit baptism based on the narrative literature of Acts and the longer ending of Mark. Tongues in Acts seem to have the function of providing evidence of Spirit baptism. Following the pattern of other “restorationists,” he elevated this factor in the history of the Church to doctrinal standing.

    Convinced by their study, and after much prayer, Parham and his students and fellow ministers reported their own practice of tongues-speaking, although only sporadic instances had occurred. After their experience with tongues, Parham formulated the doctrine of “initial evidence” (that tongues-speaking is the initial evidence of Spirit baptism). He is the one who pioneered this doctrine of tongues as a special sign of Spirit baptism. Because he was the first to insist on tongues as the necessary evidence of this subsequent work of Spirit baptism he is the origin of this basic distinctive in Pentecostalism today.

    Following Benjamin Irwin however, Parham still taught that Spirit baptism was a third work of grace (conversion and sanctification being the first and second respectively).

    Although under Charles Parham only sporadic instances of tongues-speaking occurred, what had begun in Topeka was the seed that directly resulted in the amazing growth of Pentecostalism out of the Azusa Street meetings under William Seymour. [2]

    The Azusa Street Revival of 1906-1909 was the beginning of Pentecostalism. Before William Seymour went to Los Angeles he had been influenced by Parham in Topeka. He was a former student of Parham at his Bible school and as a result Seymour inherited Parham's unique doctrine of Spirit baptism with tongues speaking at the “initial evidence,” and used the platform at Azusa Street to teach this. Seymour also borrowed heavily from John Wesley’s Doctrines and Discipline. [5]

    Parham's legacy and the events surrounding him in Topeka also contributed to the Azusa Street revival by fueling the escatological expectancy of a “latter rain” outpouring of the Spirit. The widespread burden for evangelism, coupled with this theological backbone, inspired a global outreach that has accompanied the Pentecostal movement since its beginning.

    When tongues-speaking re-occurred at the Azusa Street meetings Seymour announced in excitement in his newspaper (the Apostolic Faith) that the “latter rain” of Joel 2:23 had come. News quickly spread overseas through the newspaper and by secular media like the Los Angeles Times and then even more so by visitors from around America and overseas who travelled back from the Azusa Street meetings.

    While the majority of Holiness leaders rejected this revival and the doctrine of Parham and Seymour, the young leaders from more radical Holiness groups came to investigate the phenomenon on display there. [3] The Azusa Street meetings were characterised by spontaneous prayer and preaching and the active participation of women. In addition, an unparalleled inter-racial makeup of the services also highlighted the revival, accompanied by a message of reconciliation. In particular, however, visitors witnessed what they saw to be evidence of a special post-conversion baptismal experience of the Holy Spirit. Those that were convinced carried home with them this new teaching, and Pentecostalism began as a wold-wide movement.

    “Pentecostalism made its greatest inroads where Holiness movements were already prospering, and it attracted far more non-Methodists than had the earlier forms of perfectionism. Besides the emphasis on the baptism of the Holy Spirit, Pentecostalism recognized divine healing and demanded highly puritanical standards of personal conduct. Like the Holiness groups the Pentecostals were theological conservatives, and they comprised an important addition to the Arminian wing of Protestant conservatism in the period when the fundamentalist movement was gathering steam.” [4]


    To summarise, the rapid beginning of Pentecostalism can be understood against the backdrop of a revival of tongues-speaking in Topeka, 1901, after which Charles Parham formulated the doctrine of “initial evidence:” that tongues-speaking is the initial evidence of Spirit baptism, which he understood to be a separate work of the Spirit to conversion and sanctification. Then when the re-occurrence of tongues speaking at the Azusa Street meetings from 1906-1909 gained a worldwide audience, William Seymour, a former student of Parham, used the revival as a platform to teach this new doctrine of Spirit baptism. Visitors witnessed this first-hand and then carried the new teaching abroad.

    But what of the early decades of the twentieth-century after the birth of Pentecostalism? What controvercies arose in the infancy of this movement? And what place did they have in defining the Pentecostalism of today? In the next article we'll be talking about how Pentecostalism was shaped in its early years.

    More on this topic

    How Pentecostalism developed over time

    Why Pentecostalism was successful

    Where Australian Pentecostalism came from

    - -

    [1] Vinson Synan (Ph. D., University of Georgia), “Pentecostalism,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 900.

    [2] Grant. R. Osborne (Ph.D., University of Aberdeen), “Tongues, Speaking in,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 1208.

    [3] Mark A. Noll (Ph.D., Vanderbilt University), “Azusa Street Revival,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 125.

    [4] Richard. V. Pierard (Ph.D., University of Iowa), “Holiness Movement, American”, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 565. [5] The Oxford companion to Christian thought / edited by Adrian Hastings ... [et al.], Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2000, Pentecostalism.


    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    How early Pentecostals saw themselves

    The key to understanding the teachings of the modern Pentecostal movement is understanding their origin. The first Pentecostals, who embraced this movement at that time in history when it began, had a determining influence on the Pentecostalism of today. We need to understand how early Pentecostals themselves interpreted the historical events surrounding their origin. How did they view Pentecostalism?

    "When tongues-speaking occurred in Topeka in 1901, the only significant addition to the foregoing was to insist that tongues-speaking was the biblical evidence of receiving the Holy Spirit baptism. All the other teachings and practices of Pentecostalism were adapted from the Holiness milieu in which it was born, including its style of worship, its hymnody, and its basic theology." (McGee, 1995) [1]
    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit. Firstly, the original Pentecostals knew that their doctrine of tongues-speaking was unique.

    Pentecostalism began with the belief that the gift of tongues was the evidence of baptism in the Spirit. Although Pentecostalism came from within the Holiness movement it emerged as a new and distinct movement because of this unique role given to the practice of tongues. Although the Holiness movement did teach that Spirit-baptism was a second experience to empower Christians, it did not stress charismatic phenomena such as speaking in tongues. [2] The priority of the gift of tongues was inherited by early Pentecostals from Charles Parham who was the first to insisted that speaking in tongues was the evidence of Spirit baptism (that he believed to be the third work of grace.) [3]

    Secondly, early Petecostals believed that the Spirit's work in those who had spoken in tongues was unique.

    This is the reason why the practice of tongues-speaking was elevated in importance. It was Charles Parham again who was the first to articulate this so specifically. Charles Parham's saw an elite band of Spirit-baptised evangelists as fulfilling the Great Commission before the End. Gary B. McGee (as Professor of Church History, Assemblies of God Theological Seminary) describes Parham's view of the recipients of baptism in the Spirit:
    "Sanctified and prepared now as an elite band of end-time missionaries, they alone [will] be taken by Christ at the (pre-Tribulation) rapture of the Church after they had completed their role in fulfilling the Great Commission. Other Christians [will] face the ordeal of survival during the seven years of tribulation to follow." [4]
    McGee comments, "Despite the eventual relegation of this teaching to the fringes of the Pentecostal movement, it did raise an issue that still lingers: the uniqueness of the Spirit's work in those who have spoken in tongues as compared with those who have not." [4] It is a consequence of the Pentecostal belief (that Spirit-baptism is a unique work of the Spirit in some Christians) that the practice of tongues-speaking is a doctrinal priority in this movement. Tongues-speaking distinguishes between those who have had Spirit-baptism and those who have not. In other words, speaking in tongues funtions to divide the Church into two groups: those who are Christians only and those who are Spirit-empowered Christians.

    Thirdly, early Pentecostals believed that with the beginning of their movement came the restoration of the Apostolic faith.

    In 1922 Daniel W. Kerr (who has been called “the most influential theological voice in the early years of the Assemblies of God” [5]) wrote an article entitled “The Basis for Our Distinctive Testimony,” in which he remarked:
    "During the past few years God has enabled us to discover and recover this wonderful truth concerning Baptism in the Spirit as it was given at the beginning. Thus we have all that the others got [i.e., Luther, Wesley, Blumhardt, Trudel, and A. B. Simpson], and we got this too. We see all that they see, but they don't see what we see." [5]
    McGee himself believes in regard to the 1901 revival at Topeka, that "the 'apostolic faith' of the New Testament Church had at last been fully restored." [6] This point is further proven by the fact that Bennett Freeman Lawrence -- who wrote the first history of the Pentecostal movement -- named his book, "The Apostolic Faith Restored" (1916). [7]

    Conclusion

    The first Pentecostal thinkers themselves understood their doctrine of tongues-speaking to be unique in church history, and interpreted the events surrounding the beginning of the twentieth-century as the end-time restoration of the “Apostolic faith” in preparation for Christ's return. The practice of tongues speaking was specifically given doctrinal priority because it distinguishes between those who have received the unique work of Spirit-baptism from those Christians who have not.

    But how did Pentecostalism grow so rapidly? How is it that by 1909, after only three years, Pentecostalism had become a world-wide movement? In the next article we'll be talking about why Pentecostalism was so successful.

    More on this topic

    Why Pentecostalism was successful

    Why Pentecostalism began

    How Pentecostalism developed over time

    - -

    [1] Gary B. McGee (Ph.D., Professor of Church History, Chair, Bible and Theology Department at Assemblies of God Theological Seminary), Systematic Theology, Chapter 1 “Historical Background”, Logion Press, 1995, p. 15-16.

    [2] Vinson Synan (Ph. D., University of Georgia), “Pentecostalism”, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 900.

    [3] Ibid., p. 15-16 (emphasis his).

    [4] Gary B. McGee (Ph.D., Professor of Church History, Chair, Bible and Theology Department at Assemblies of God Theological Seminary), Systematic Theology, Chapter 1 “Historical Background”, Logion Press, 1995, p. 17.

    [5] Ibid., p. 16.

    [6] Ibid., p. 16 (emphasis his).

    [7] Ibid., p. 16 (emphasis his).


    Why Pentecostalism began

    Pentecostalism began as a worldwide movement when a revival of tongues speaking at the beginning of the 20th century attracted international attention. Speaking about the origin of Pentecostalism, Vinson Synan (Ph. D., University of Georgia) says, “The Topeka and Los Angeles events took place in a turn-of-the century religious environment that encouraged the appearance of such a Pentecostal movement.” [1] The question is, what was the religious environment that encouraged the appearance of Pentecostalism? What prepared the world for Pentecostalism, historically? In other words, why did Pentecostalism begin?

    Firstly, people were seeking the "gift of languages". [2] Among those committed to world evangelisation serious concerns arose over how the unreached millions were going to hear the gospel before the end. Several factors generated these concerns: The missions movement had spent considerable time and energy but the numbers of conversions of native peoples was alarmingly small; the premillennialists' gloomy assessment of the immediate future caused Christians in this movement to expect the condition of humankind to get worse before the imminent return of the Lord; and then when the arms race of the 1890s occurred and the end of the century was approaching, the Christian expectation of the end of the world was considerably heightened.

    Widespread interest in the gifts of the Spirit convinced some that God was going to restore the gift of tongues (identifiable human languages) to the Church to equip them to preach the gospel in other countries, in preparation for the end. In 1895 the widely read Holiness author W. B. Godbey predicted: “[The “Gift of Language” is] destined to play a conspicuous part in the evangelization of the heathen world, amid the glorious prophetical fulfilment of the latter days. All missionaries in heathen lands should seek and expect this Gift to enable them to preach fluently in the vernacular tongue, at the same time not depreciating their own efforts.” [3]

    Frank W. Sandford was another teacher who advocated the missionary use of tongues-speaking. He spread this teaching in his publication “Tongues of Fire” through which he endevoured to rapidly evangelise the world. He and others were praying and expected to receive the gift of “power and eloquence” for evangelism. This desire for the gift of languages set the stage for the revival of tongues speaking that occurred in the early 1900s.

    Secondly, people were seeking a restoration of the "full" gospel. The Holiness movement sought to restore what it understood to be New Testament Christianity to the Church in the last days in preparation for Christ's return. This led to the movement reforming existing theology to develop what it saw to be the “full" gospel. Reflecting this desire, A. B. Simpson blended together four themes of Christ as Savior, Baptizer, Healer, and Coming King. In time this was described as the “full gospel” or “fourfold gospel.” [4] This change of theology set the stage for Pentecostalism.

    "By the turn of the century, the Holiness movement had become preoccupied with the “Pentecostal reformation of Weslyan doctrine” and the four themes of the full gospel. In fact, when the Pentecostal movement began a few years later, only the priority given to the gift of tongues distinguished it theologically from Holiness beliefs." [5]
    Thirdly, people were seeing spiritual experiences as “crisis” events. The Holiness movement taught that Christian spirituality involved seeking distinct experiences that occured as instant events. This in turn set the stage for the Pentecostal doctrine of Spirit baptism as a separate experience to conversion.

    "Not only did such Holiness teachers emphasize conscious religious experiences, they tended to encourage persons to seek for them as “crisis” experiences that could be received in an instant of time through prayer and faith. By 1890 the Holiness movement began to think of religious experiences more in terms of crisis than in gradual categories. Thus the Fire-Baptized Holiness Church taught instant conversion through the new birth, instant sanctification as a second blessing, instant baptism in the Holy Ghost and fire, instant divine healing through prayer, and the instant premillennial second coming of Christ." [6]
    Fourthly, there was a need for "evidence" of the second work. Benjamin Hardin Irwin was a radical Weslyan Holiness preacher who taught a third work of grace for power in Christian service. In 1895 he began teaching that the second work of grace initiated sanctification and the third brought baptism in the Spirit. This “third blessing” was called “the fire.” Irwin named his group the Fire-Baptized Holiness Church, beginning another movement that started new groups across America and Canada. This created the problem of needing evidence to distinguishing between those who had received the third blessing from those who had the second only. This problem was part of the reason why the mainstream Holiness Movement rejected his as the “third blessing heresy.”

    This controversy laid an important foundation for Pentecostalism because it crystallised the movement's commitment to a two-stage work of the Spirit (which would be simpler to identify). It also highlighted the need to clarify what is the nature of the second work of grace (which would be empowerment, not sanctification). In addition, the Irwin heresy (as it was called) revealed the need for an evidence for the second work of grace. This again set the stage for Pentecostalism which provided that evidence. Irwin later joined the Pentecostal Movement.

    To summarise, the historical situation at the turn of the nineteenth-century that encouraged the appearance of Pentecostalism was a widespread desire for the gift of languages for world evangelisation, the desire for a restoration of the “full gospel” involving Spirit-baptism as a post-conversion experience and the miraculous gifts such as healing, the emphasis on spiritual experiences as “crisis” events, and the theological necessity of an evidence to distinguish those having received subsequent works of the Spirit from those who had not.

    But in order to understand the origin of Pentecostalism completely we also need to understand how early Pentecostal thinkers themselves interpreted the historical events surrounding their beginnings. Did they themselves understand their doctrine of tongues-speaking to be unique in church history? Did they interpret the events surrounding the beginning of the twentieth-century as the end-time restoration of the “Apostolic faith” in preparation for Christ's return? In the next article, we'll talk about how early Pentecostals viewed Pentecostalism.

    More on this topic

    How early Pentecostals saw themselves

    (PART 3) Where Pentecostalism came from - The Holiness movement

    Why Pentecostalism was successful

    - -

    [1] Vinson Synan (Ph. D., University of Georgia), “Pentecostalism”, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 899.

    [2] Gary B. McGee (Ph.D., Professor of Church History, Chair, Bible and Theology Department at Assemblies of God Theological Seminary), Systematic Theology, Chapter 1 “Historical Background”, Logion Press, 1995, p. 14-15.

    [3] Ibid., p. 15.

    [4] Ibid., p. 14-15.

    [5] Ibid., p. 15-16.

    [6] Vinson Synan (Ph. D., University of Georgia), “Pentecostalism,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 900.


    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    The history of tongues

    Tongues-speaking [1] has occurred since ancient times in both the non-Jewish and non-Christian world.
    “In the ancient world, ecstatic utterances, trances, and frenzied behavior were commonly associated with pagan prophets. Eleventh-century B.C. documents record occurrences of ecstatic speech and the like in Egypt. In the Hellenistic world the prophetess of Delphi and the Sibylline priestess spoke in unknown or unintelligible speech. Moreover, the Dionysian rites contained a trancelike state as well as glossolalia. Many of the magicians and sorcerers of the first-century world exhibited similar phenomenon, as is the case of the “spirit of divination” (or possibly ventriloquism) at Philippi in Acts 16:16-18.” [2]
    Tongues-speaking has also been reported throughout Church history. In 150 AD, Irenaeus, a Greek father of the early church, wrote “...we hear many of the brethren in the church who have prophetic gifts, and who speak in tongues through the Spirit, and who also bring to light the secret things of men for their benefit...” [3] [4] Tertullian (ca. 155-220) (a Latin father for the early church) also spoke favourably of this gift. [5]

    Montanism was a prophetic movement that broke out in Phrigia in Roman Asia Minor (Turkey) around 172AD. It made tongues-speaking a central part of their worship experience. Montanists followed Montanus of Phrygis, who said he was the chosen instrument of the Spirit to prepare the church for the second coming. He taught a strict asceticism, which soon developed into legalism. It was condemned by bishops in Asia and elsewhere. A residual sect persisted in Phrygia for some centuries before it disappeared. [6]

    By the middle of the fourth century, the practice seems to have diminished in the West, [7] although Vincent Ferrer and Francis Xavier were missionaries who described their miraculous ability to communicate with various groups as glossolalia, [8] and other examples exist. [9] In addition many believe that in the Eastern church tongues-speaking continued to be practised in Greek Orthodox monasteries throughout the Middle Ages. [10]

    At the end of the seventeenth century, widespread tongues-speaking occurred for a little over a decade in southern France among a group of persecuted Huguenots. Similarly, in the 1730s an occurrence of tongues-speaking happened among a group of Catholic pietists, called the Jansenists. [11]

    Then in the 1830s until the end of the century, a revival of tongues-speaking occurred in England during the ministry of Edward Irving. After reports that tongues-speaking had occurred in the west of Scotland in the spring of 1830, Irving himself shortly after reported such expressions in his Regent Square Church. Until the end of the century, his followers (Irvingites) made tongues-speaking central to their church life. [12]

    The example of the Huguenots and Irvingites then led to similar occurrences in Mother Anne Lee's Shaker movement in England and America, and among the Mormons in America were Joseph Smith's followers in New York, Missouri, and Utah began practising tongues-speaking. [13] Not long after, in the 1850s, a tongues-speaking movement began in Russia that continued throughout the century. [14]

    Similarly, beginning around 1860 on the Southern tip of India, through the influence of Plymouth Brethren theology [15] and the leadership of the Indian J.C. Aroolappen a revival of tongues-speaking and prophecy was reported. [16]

    In addition to the occurrences of tongues-speaking in 1901 in Topeka and in Los Angeles in 1906-9, it also arose in the Welsh revival in 1904-5. [17]

    It seems, then, that tongues-speaking, whether unknown utterances or miraculous gifts of languages have been reported throughout history. However, what makes Pentecostalism unique is that never before has tongues-speaking been given the doctrinal importance that modern Pentecostals gave to it.


    “Pentecostals... were the first to give doctrinal primacy to the practice. Though Pentecostals recognize such sporadic instances of tongues-speaking and other charismatic phenomena throughout the Christian era, they stress the special importance of the Azusa Street revival, which occurred in... 1906 to 1909 and launched Pentecostalism as a worldwide movement.” [18]
    But to understand why Pentecostals were the first charismatic movement in history to give tongues-speaking theological importance we need to understand the theological roots of Pentecostalism.

    That's why in the next article, “Where did Pentecostalism come from?” we'll talk about the theological roots of Pentecostalism.

    More on this topic

    (PART 1) Where Pentecostalism came from - The theology of John Wesley

    How Pentecostalism developed over time

    Tongues and Spirit-baptism: What Pentecostals believe

    The gift of tongues: What the Scriptures describe

    - -

    [1] The Greek word for “tongues” is, glossolalia, meaning “languages.” While the tongues-speaking enabled by the Spirit in Acts 2:4 were identifiable known dialects of countries foreign to the speaker, some think 1 Corinthians 14:2 indicates another type of tongues. This is based upon the view that if “no one understands him” except God, and his words “utter mysteries with his spirit,” then this tongues-speaking is not an actual language, but rather “unknown utterances.” Whether this is a valid reading of this text, this history to tongues-speaking records the reporting of both types of phenomenon (the miraculous gift of languages and speaking unknown utterances).

    [2] Grant. R. Osborne (Ph.D., University of Aberdeen), “Tongues, Speaking in,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 1206.

    [3] Refutation and Overthrow of False Doctrine, p. 174.

    [4] Elsewhere Irenaeus said, “When God saw it necessary, and the church prayed and fasted much, they did miraculous things, even of bringing back the spirit to a dead man.”

    [5] Grant. R. Osborne (Ph.D., University of Aberdeen), “Tongues, Speaking in,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 1207.

    [6] David F. Wright (D.D, University of Edinburgh), “Montanism,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 790.

    [7] Chrysostom (ca. 347-407) was quite negative about it. Augustine (354-430) taught that it had been given only for the New Testament times. However, Luther and Calvin both accepted the continuing validity of tongues, speaking positively of the gift, primarily in terms of missionary preaching. Similarly, John Wesley believed that tongues-speaking was still a valid gift.

    [8] Grant. R. Osborne (Ph.D., University of Aberdeen), “Tongues, Speaking in,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 1208.

    [9] Abbess Hildegard recorded unknown tongues in Lingua Ignota.

    [10] Grant. R. Osborne (Ph.D., University of Aberdeen), “Tongues, Speaking in,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 1208.

    [11] Grant. R. Osborne (Ph.D., University of Aberdeen), “Tongues, Speaking in,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 1208.

    [12] Ian S. Rennie (Ph.D., University of Toronto), “Irving, Edward,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 617-618.

    [13] Vinson Synan (Ph.D., University of Georgia), “Pentecostalism”, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 899.

    [14] Grant. R. Osborne (Ph.D., University of Aberdeen), “Tongues, Speaking in,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 1208.

    [15] They taught a charismatic eschatology which they inherited from Edward Irving. Irving influenced J. N. Darby, a leader in the Brethren movement of the nineteenth-century. Irving taught a charismatic eschatology: that in a period prior to the Second Coming a special “latter-rain” outpouring of the Holy Spirit would occur. Darby became the leader of the exclusive group known as the Plymouth Brethren movement and develop classical dispensationalism, which even more specifically taught that there would be a special time in history for the church in the period just prior to Christ's Second Coming.

    [16] Gary B. McGee (Ph.D., Professor of Church History, Chair, Bible and Theology Department at Assemblies of God Theological Seminary), Systematic Theology, Chapter 1 “Historical Background,” Logion Press, 1995, p. 10.

    [17] Grant. R. Osborne (Ph.D., University of Aberdeen), “Tongues, Speaking in,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 1208.

    [18] Vinson Synan (Ph.D., University of Georgia), “Pentecostalism,” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, 2nd Ed., Paternoster Press, 2001, p. 899.


    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    How Pentecostalism began

    Pentecostalism traces its conception to a revival at the very beginning of the twentieth-century. In January 1901 Agnes Ozman began to speak in tongues at Bethel Bible School in Topeka, Kansas. Ozman was a student of Charles Fox Parham, a former Methodist preacher and now teacher at Bethel Bible School. Not long after this most of Parham's students – himself included – apparently began speaking in tongues also.

    Charles Parham became the origin of Pentecostalism's distinctive teaching. He was the first to insisted on tongues-speaking as the necessary “initial evidence” of Spirit baptism as an experience of the Spirit subsequent to conversion. [1]

    Pentecostalism was born with a second much larger revival that followed this five years later. In April 1906, William J. Seymour founded the Apostolic Faith Gospel Mission in Los Angeles and began meetings there. Seymour was a Holiness preacher, and the meetings were held in an abandoned Methodist church at 312 Azusa Street.

    Seymour used his platform at Azusa Street to teach that Christians should expect a Spirit baptism accompanied by tongues-speaking as the “initial evidence.” Shortly after tongues-speaking re-occurred at the meetings, and continued for three years until 1909.

    News quickly spread overseas and only a year after the opening of the Azusa Street meetings visiting leaders from all over the nation and around the world began returning home with this new teaching, and as a result Pentecostalism began as a worldwide movement.

    To understand these events (the origin of Pentecostalism), we need to firstly understand the background to the occurrence of tongues-speaking throughout history.

    That's why in the next article we'll talk about “What is the history of tongues?”

    More on this topic

    Why the origin of Pentecostalism is important

    The history of tongues

    Why Pentecostalism was successful

    - -

    [1] While Pentecostalism now teaches that Spirit baptism is a second work of grace, Parham taught that it was the third (after firstly conversion, and secondly sanctification).

    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    Why the origin of Pentecostalism is important

    How can we truly understand something as complex as modern Pentecostalism? A complete understanding of Pentecostalism must involve an understanding of its history. And the crucial element within the history of Pentecostalism is its origin. The key to understanding Pentecostalism is understanding the origin of Pentecostalism.

    Looking at the origin of Pentecostalism shows us, as well as where it came from, how it originated and why. How did Pentecostalism begin? What is the history of tongues? Where did Pentecostalism come from? Why did Pentecostalism begin?

    Answering these questions will enable us to to begin to truly understand both the general characteristics of Pentecostalism and its specific distinctives. Talking Pentecostalism begins by answering not only these questions, but also the questions that spring from them, such as what did early Pentecostals think about themselves and their movement, why was Pentecostalism successful, and how was Pentecostalism shaped.

    Here is a brief overview of the topics covered in my articles on the origin of Pentecostalism:

    • Pentecostalism began as a worldwide movement when a revival of tongues speaking at the beginning of the twentieth-century attracted international attention. Visitors to the revival carried Pentecostalism’s distinctive theology around the world within just a few years.



    • Tongues speaking, whether unknown utterances or miraculous gifts of languages, have been reported throughout history. However, what makes Pentecostalism unique is that never before has tongues speaking been given the doctrinal importance that modern Pentecostals have given to it.



    • Pentecostalism has its roots in the eighteenth-century Wesleyan doctrine of 'entire sanctification', which taught that sanctification involves a 'second blessing' as an experience of the Spirit distinct from conversion. Then, in the nineteenth-century, the Irvingites spread a charismatic eschatology which taught that the period prior to the second coming of Christ would see an end-time outpouring of the Spirit, accompanied by a restoration to the Church of the 'sign gifts' such as tongues and healing. Also at this time, Wesleyan doctrine spread to America where it inspired the Holiness movement, which reformed Wesleyan theology on the 'second blessing' by teaching that Spirit-baptism was the second experience to empower Christians for miraculous evangelisation.



    • The historical situation at the turn of the nineteenth-century that encouraged the appearance of Pentecostalism was a widespread desire for the gift of tongues for world evangelisation, the desire for a restoration of the 'full gospel', involving Spirit-baptism as a post-conversion experience and the miraculous gifts such as healing, the emphasis on spiritual experiences which involved 'crisis' events, and the theological necessity of an evidence to distinguish those who had received subsequent works of the Spirit from those who had not.



    • The origin of Pentecostalism can be understood against the backdrop of a revival of tongues-speaking in Topeka, 1901, after which Charles Parham formulated the doctrine of 'initial evidence': that tongues-speaking is the initial evidence of Spirit baptism, which he understood to be a separate work of the Spirit to conversion and sanctification. Then, when the re-occurrence of tongues speaking at the Azusa Street meetings from 1906-1909 gained a worldwide audience, William Seymour, a former student of Parham, used the revival as a platform to teach this new doctrine of Spirit-baptism. Visitors witnessed first-hand 'evidence' and carried abroad this new teaching.



    • Pentecostal thinkers themselves understand their doctrine of tongues-speaking to be unique in church history, and interpret the events surrounding the beginning of the twentieth-century as the end-time restoration of the 'Apostolic faith' in preparation for Christ's return. The practice of tongues-speaking is given doctrinal priority because it distinguishes between those who have received the unique work of Spirit-baptism from those Christians who have not.



    • The early decades of the twentieth-century were defining years for Pentecostalism. Dividing controversies arose over the nature of tongues, the nature and number of subsequent works of the Spirit, and the practice of water-baptism. The resolution of these issues accelerated the formation of different Pentecostal denominations, each of which took different doctrinal stances.



    The Bible's context and ours

    Only an understanding of the message of the Bible itself will enable Christians to evaluate Pentecostalism for themselves. However, just as any one-directional focus leaves us unaware of our blind-spots, so too a unifocus on the Bible, even in its context, without proper consideration to one's own context and the way that inevitably influences our perceptions of the Bible's message, runs the same risk as a swimmer who fails to notice the influence of the current upon his direction: he is bound to end up along way off course.

    Nobody can remove the impact our own environment and historical context has upon the way we each interpret the Bible. We comprehend the meaning of any story according to a variety of factors, including the words and phrases used, but also according to our presuppositions, such as where we think the story is heading, for example.

    The point is, Christians are readers. We are readers of God's Word, but we must also be readers of ourselves. The most any diligent reader can do is be aware of our influences, and seek to critically assess their effect upon our reading, and by subjecting our ideas and presuppositions to the Scriptures themselves as we read them, undergo a process of continual review and modification of our beliefs, according to how we perceive them to bear up under the evidence regarding the meaning of Scripture, and so increasingly align ourselves with the Scriptures themselves.

    For Pentecostals and those influenced by the Charismatic movement, undertanding the origin of Pentecostalism is a part of this process. It will enable you to begin to see the extent to which your reading of the Bible, and of Church history, and of your own life, has been informed by the beliefs of your own Christian culture. Understanding the origin of Pentecostalism will better enable you to distinguish within your own Christianity the way in which your understanding of the Scriptures has been determined by Pentecostalism itself rather than by their Author.

    - -

    More on this topic

    Defining Pentecostalism

    Why talk about Pentecostalism

    How Pentecostalism began

    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    Pentecostalism's famous five

    Pentecostalism is known for its focus on the work of the Holy Spirit. Pentecostals have characteristic beliefs about the Spirit's work that are unique. A distinct view of 'baptism in the Spirit,' including the necessity of 'speaking in tongues,' gave birth to Pentecostalism. Also, an emphasis on the 'gifts of the Spirit' has been an important characteristic of the movement since its origin. In addition, Pentecostalism has developed specific beliefs about the Holy Spirit and 'divine healing' (including 'prosperity'), 'praise and worship' and 'guidance' (or 'revelation').

    I call them the famous five:
    1 – Baptism in the Spirit (including speaking in tongues)
    2 – Gifts of the Spirit (also including speaking in tongues)
    3 – Divine Healing and Prosperity
    4 – Praise and Worship
    5 – Guidance and Revelation

    One of the aims of Talking Pentecostalism is to discuss each of these areas in turn in order to understand Pentecostalism better. At each stage we'll also look at the Scriptures themselves in order to understand them better. But the place to begin is by getting Pentecostalism in context. This means understanding its history and particularly its origin.

    More on this topic

    Defining Pentecostalism
    Why the origin of Pentecostalism is important
    How Pentecostalism began

    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.

    Defining Pentecostalism: What is a Pentecostal?

    A Pentecostal is somebody who is a part of Pentecostalism. So what is 'Pentecostalism'?

    A Definition of 'Pentecostalism'

    A movement

    Pentecostalism is a movement; it is a trend within Christianity of a growing group that share characteristic beliefs and goals. The Charismatic movement is the influence of Pentecostalism among mainline church denominations. Though there are thousands of Pentecostal denominations worldwide, such as the Assemblies of God, the Apostolic Church and the Full Gospel Church, the Charismatic movement has shown that Pentecostalism transcends denominations.

    A modern movement

    Pentecostalism is also a modern movement because it emerged only recently in modern history. Its definite origin and unique theology distinguishes it from other movements in history, such as Montanism (a prophetic movement of the second century), that although similar, did not possess the doctrinal distinctives of Pentecostalism. Pentecostalism has a characteristic doctrinal teaching concerning “baptism with the Spirit”1 (or “Spirit baptism” for short) which is unique from any other past movement in history.

    A reformation movement

    Pentecostalism is also a reformation movement because it seeks to reform certain doctrines and practices of the past by its influence in the present. Pentecostalism not only began by reforming various doctrines of the past, but still today one of the goals of this movement is the continuing reformation of the church in these areas.
    “It bears strong commonalities with evangelical doctrines while testifying to long-neglected truths about the work of the Holy Spirit...”2
    A restoration movement

    Pentecostalism is a restoration movement. It began with a belief that in its origin God was restoring New Testament Christianity to the church today by bringing a discovery and recovery of certain truths and experiences of the Spirit. And now by virtue of its rapid growth and huge worldwide influence, Pentecostalism today is increasingly bringing such a 'restoration' to the church because of the way it is “reshaping Christianity in the twenty-first century.”3

    "Thus far the twentieth-century Pentecostal movement has succeeded in restoring the experiential dimension of the Spirit's dynamic presence to a significant segment of the church. Pentecostals believe that recovery of the doctrine and experience of being baptized in the Holy Spirit is comparable to the Reformation's recovery of the doctrine of justification by faith."4
    A charismatic movement

    Pentecostalism is also a charismatic movement because it characteristically emphasises the working and gifts of the Spirit,5 with a special focus on baptism with the Spirit, the gift of tongues and the other spiritual gifts of 1 Corinthians 12:8-10.

    A unique charismatic movement

    Pentecostalism is a movement with a distinctive doctrine of Pentecost that makes it unique among other charismatic movements in history. What makes Pentecostalism unique from other charismatic movements is its distinctive doctrine of Spirit baptism, and the priority this gives to the gifts of the Spirit, particularly the gift of tongues. This comes from a particular reading of the Pentecost events: Acts 2 when baptism with the Spirit was first given to Jews, and Acts 8, 10 and 19 when it was repeated among Samaritans, Gentiles and some of John's disciples. Pentecostalism teaches that baptism with the Spirit is a post-conversion experience of empowerment for supernatural Christian living, with “speaking in tongues”6 as the initial physical evidence.

    Putting it all together

    Pentecostalism may be defined as a modern charismatic reformation movement with a distinctive theology of Spirit baptism that gives doctrinal priority to the gift of tongues.

    However this definition does not include the fact that Pentecostalism also refers at times to a separate theological system with its own distinctive method, doctrines and practices.7

    More on this topic

    Why talk about Pentecostalism

    The famous five

    Why the origin of Pentecostalism is important

    Baptism in the Spirit: What Pentecostals believe

    - -

    1 Baptism “in” or “with” the Spirit are synonymous terms. However baptism “by” or “of” the Spirit are misleading translations, because the Scriptures repeatedly indicate that this baptism was given by Jesus, not by the Spirit; that is, it is the baptism of Jesus, as opposed to the baptism of John – it was a baptism with the Spirit, or in the Spirit, as opposed to John's baptism that was with water, or in water. However, since Acts 2 and the OT Scriptures refer to this baptism as being a “pouring out” of the Spirit by Jesus, as opposed to an “immersion in” the Spirit, the translation “baptism with the Spirit” is the most appropriate.
    2 Gary B. McGee (Ph.D., Professor of Church History, Chair, Bible and Theology Department at Assemblies of God Theological Seminary), Systematic Theology, Chapter 1 “Historical Background”, Logion Press, 1995, p. 9.
    3 Harvey Cox, Harvard University.
    4 John W. Wyckoff (Ph.D., Professor of Bible and Theology, Chair, Church Ministries Division at Southwestern Assemblies of God College), Systematic Theology, Chapter 13 “The Baptism in the Holy Spirit”, Logion Press, 1995, p. 454.
    5 “Charismatic” comes from the Greek word, charismata, meaning “gifts.”
    6 While the Greek word for “tongues” (glossolalia) is literally “languages”, Pentecostals base their practice of tongues-speaking on ideas in 1 Corinthians 14, where the practice may not be associated with known languages. The use of this word in Pentecostalism is almost synonymous for “unknown utterances.”
    7 Examples of different theological systems are Calvinism and Arminianism, or Protestantism and Catholicism.

    talkingpentecostalism.blogspot.com | joe towns: christian discussion on pentecost, charisma, pentecostal and charismatic beliefs, the Bible and Jesus; including the origin and history of pentecostalism, baptism in the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues, gifts and miracles, divine healing and word of faith, prosperity and wealth, praise and worship, guidance and hearing the voice of the Holy Spirit.